Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

SandyCanada Resident · (This post was last modified: 12-23-2022 06:37 AM by SandyCanada Resident.)

https://gyazo.com/db3ccab20f81754d537a618a66b0830a

Ivy Norsk · 12-23-2022, 08:42 AM

Congrats! on a second discovery!

[Image: db3ccab20f81754d537a618a66b0830a.png]

Eleanor8 Resident · 12-24-2022, 12:00 PM

Congrats on your find Sandy.

This is going to look fabulous on the Powder Blues.

[Image: 355ec6b326682c3d55c4f7bc20f0f635.png]

Eleanor8 Resident · 02-13-2023, 07:19 PM

Dusky Blue Tipped White is recessive to Blush Tipped White.

[Image: 0d2bc75420f9c5e5d942ca81a11d0afa.png]

[Image: c0ba8042b249f155bf43bbadb70f4cfd.png]

Polenth Yue · 02-17-2023, 06:25 PM

Dusky blue tipped white is dominant to white tipped grey. Lucky has dusky blue tipped white whiskers. Blue has grey tipped white whiskers. Their kitten has white tipped grey whiskers, which are dominant to grey tipped white, so can't have come from Blue. Therefore, Lucky must be carrying white tipped grey under the dusky blue.

SisterButta Resident · 03-01-2023, 11:45 AM

We've been working on this in a Discord channel for dummies like me to learn how to do a proof, so bear with me if I don't post the "proof" in the proper format.

Paired my starter that hid the new whisker (DBTW) with a Russian Black with a solid/pure SMOKE whisker. The Russian Black's pedigree shows that he could not possibly hide anything more recessive than SMOKE because of age of his grand on both sides.

Here are the pertinent links:

1. Pedigree for the Russian Black: https://gyazo.com/2a71d0523782b295af0d077a282f74c1

2. Pedigree for the Starter hiding DBTW:
https://gyazo.com/567c2c16ff53b87f329a89362454b368

Polenth Yue · 03-01-2023, 03:48 PM

(03-01-2023 11:45 AM)SisterButta Resident Wrote: We've been working on this in a Discord channel for dummies like me to learn how to do a proof, so bear with me if I don't post the "proof" in the proper format.

This is a good question. I posted a proof for this whisker too, but the information wasn't included in the updates (newer things have been updated since then). So I'm not sure what we have to do to alert people to new proofs, other than putting them in the forum. Or if there's as format the proofs must follow.

LittleMe Jewell · (This post was last modified: 03-01-2023 08:28 PM by LittleMe Jewell.)

(03-01-2023 11:45 AM)SisterButta Resident Wrote: We've been working on this in a Discord channel for dummies like me to learn how to do a proof, so bear with me if I don't post the "proof" in the proper format.

Paired my starter that hid the new whisker (DBTW) with a Russian Black with a solid/pure SMOKE whisker. The Russian Black's pedigree shows that he could not possibly hide anything more recessive than SMOKE because of age of his grand on both sides.

Here are the pertinent links:

1. Pedigree for the Russian Black: https://gyazo.com/2a71d0523782b295af0d077a282f74c1

2. Pedigree for the Starter hiding DBTW:
https://gyazo.com/567c2c16ff53b87f329a89362454b368

You did the proof post correct. You posted the pictures showing what needed to be shown, though typically the poster then also states what the pictures are proving.

In your case, the pictures are proving that the Dusky Blue Tipped White is dominant to Smoke.

For that proof, we actually already knew it due to Polenth's post showing that the Dusky Blue Tipped White is dominant to White Tipped Grey.

I'm also posting the pictures inline to make it easier for others to see:
The first picture is Shaun's lineage showing his grandparents are too old to be hiding the Black Tipped White. The second picture then shows Shaun mated to the Starter that passes the Dusky Blue Tipped White and the baby has to be hiding Shaun's Smoke.

[Image: 2a71d0523782b295af0d077a282f74c1.png]

[Image: 2a71d0523782b295af0d077a282f74c1.png]

[Image: 567c2c16ff53b87f329a89362454b368.png]

(03-01-2023 03:48 PM)Polenth Yue Wrote: This is a good question. I posted a proof for this whisker too, but the information wasn't included in the updates (newer things have been updated since then). So I'm not sure what we have to do to alert people to new proofs, other than putting them in the forum. Or if there's as format the proofs must follow.

It looks like the only updates making it to the Dominance Charts thread are the ones for new traits. We haven't had any of the recent placement type proofs added into that thread since mid-Feb. I imagine they'll get things all up to date soon. I've started keeping my own notes so that I don't have to bounce through all of the individual threads right now.

SisterButta Resident · 03-01-2023, 08:57 PM

(03-01-2023 03:48 PM)Polenth Yue Wrote: This is a good question. I posted a proof for this whisker too, but the information wasn't included in the updates (newer things have been updated since then). So I'm not sure what we have to do to alert people to new proofs, other than putting them in the forum. Or if there's as format the proofs must follow.

It looks like the only updates making it to the Dominance Charts thread are the ones for new traits. We haven't had any of the recent placement type proofs added into that thread since mid-Feb. I imagine they'll get things all up to date soon. I've started keeping my own notes so that I don't have to bounce through all of the individual threads right now.
[/quote]

=================
Hmmm....we were going by the dominance charts that didn't show that DBTW is dominant to Smoke. Sorry to have cluttered up your thread with out-of-date information.

LittleMe Jewell · 03-01-2023, 09:18 PM

(03-01-2023 08:57 PM)SisterButta Resident Wrote: =================
Hmmm....we were going by the dominance charts that didn't show that DBTW is dominant to Smoke. Sorry to have cluttered up your thread with out-of-date information.

No problem with posting the info. I imagine the entire process was still a good learning experience. And extra info on something never hurts.