Coverboy. You proved Scottish Shorthair Blue and White dominant to Aby Dark the 6th December, when you pulled Aby Dark from behind Mercury's shown Scotty Blue & White.
(12-05-2017 11:04 PM)Coverboytoy Resident Wrote:
Then, you breed Mercury and Sirena'a next offspring (SSB&W hiding Burmilla CSor more recessive) to a Blue Mink hiding Bengal Blue or more recessive, and got a SSB&W back.
This pairing makes me wonder if you have understood what dominance testing is all about, and how dominance/recessiveness works.
The kitten hidden fur is Blue Mink/Ben Blue/More recessive. The hidden eyes are perfect Soul Whisper or more recessive, there is a Blush shade, and Puff, Wild or possibly a more recessive tail. More recessive will probaby but not certainly be Fluffy. Granddad's Pixie Point ears are dominant to Soft Curl, and therefore lost, and the kitten must therefore hide Soft Curl or more recessive from Mom.
Grandma's Scotty Folds and Flame Double Dreamy are also lost, since dad passed his shown ears and whiskers, and the hiddens must come from Mom's side, namely Latte Double plush or more recessive
While this is a good pairing for uptraiting, it is completely useless as a placement test, because it can only prove what's already proven. Nice uptraiting, though!
(12-27-2017 01:42 AM)Coverboytoy Resident Wrote: Thank you Song. Also with the pic below, I tested it with a Tonki Blue Mink (hiding Bengal Blue > Toyger Caramel), and the Scottish Shorthair Blue and White won, but with Song's proof, Siamese Chocolate Tortie is recessive to Shorthair Blue and White.
Here is a pic anyways.
(12-26-2017 10:44 AM)Songdog Woolley Wrote: Proof that Scottish Shorthair Blue & White is dominant to Siamese Chocolate Tortie:
This is a crystal clear, solid proof.
Mom is a Tonkie Blue Mink, Dad is a Scottish Blue&White.
The kitten is a Siamese Chocolate Tortie, whick is known to be dominant to Tonkie Blue Mink.
Siamese Chocolate Tortie must therefore be Dad's hidden, and recessive to Scottish Shorthair Blue And White