Kayla,
Thank you so much for restating all of this. I know it's a convoluted thing: the proof/the post.
Kayla Wrote:Since I am a bit slower than you, I am walking thorough the charts by steps for people who are like me.
On the contrary, I've fussed over the line for months, so I've been able to see it slowly. The post is a quick summing up of something that happened in slow motion, so I don't think for a minute that your work is slow. I think you're fast on the uptake. I also think it's really helpful for others to have things restated a different way.
Glad you liked the puzzle, I hope other people like it too. I also hope it puts the brakes on people who think that a pedigree that simply shows two TapOrg parents have proof of pure-bred TapOrg (or any other trait). It does take a lot more than that.
Violet eyes recessiveness -- Violet is placed!
