06-05-2014, 12:28 PM
(06-05-2014 12:26 PM)Ethereal Hurricane Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think Gandhi calculated the 6 billion people in the world who are out to get the other 6 billion people.
Isn't that a sad statement?
(06-05-2014 12:26 PM)Ethereal Hurricane Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think Gandhi calculated the 6 billion people in the world who are out to get the other 6 billion people.
(06-05-2014 12:24 PM)PrettyPoizen Resident Wrote: [ -> ]Its interesting that this discussion moved towards talk of banning and other sanctions...
(06-05-2014 12:29 PM)Deer Thistle Wrote: [ -> ](06-05-2014 12:24 PM)PrettyPoizen Resident Wrote: [ -> ]Its interesting that this discussion moved towards talk of banning and other sanctions...
I was under the impression that we were moving toward the idea that KittyCatS could beef up menagerie rewards as incentives to remove those 100L cats that can't find adoption, especially with the gross surplus of cats in general. It has proven to work in the past and I wouldn't be surprised if it was already slated for release as it has been every year around this time.
As you're the OP, what's your ideal plan for the removal of the offending cats mentioned?
(06-06-2014 01:59 AM)Vrem Vaniva Wrote: [ -> ]I guess when i said Boycott, I didn't mean walking around with picketing signs ... just "don't buy the stuff you don't approve of." We vote with our lindens every day. As for banning ... gosh, I have to confess that if a sim has banned someone i like and respect, banned for some unknown or arbitrary reason, then i am less likely to go there to shop. I don't like banning people unless they are griefers. There is a huge market that i don't go to for that reason ... well, i still go sometimes, but not as much. And i dropped the group (until forced to rejoin, probably temporarily). Go ahead, ban people, but be aware that they have friends. You ban someone, you put off their friends. It makes me worry, "they could ban me too, for no reason, and ... i just don't need to set myself up for that kind of rejection, after paying to use their services. " So i don't.
(06-05-2014 12:24 PM)PrettyPoizen Resident Wrote: [ -> ]Its interesting that this discussion moved towards talk of banning and other sanctions...Is it really that much easier to consider such drastic measures than it is to just play fair and with consideration and respect of others efforts? A meeting of the minds does not require boycotts, per se. But it would encourage conscientious choices by both breeder and seller...Should we need to be legislated up the ying yang? No, I dont think so but when it comes to self-policing lets just take note of how we never have enough cops LOL
Gandhi said it best: Be the change you wish to see in the world