Drop Menu Website Template
Image
image
image


Hello There, Guest! Register

Post Reply 
New Fur Tonkinese Champagne recessiveness
02-28-2016, 03:47 PM (This post was last modified: 02-28-2016 03:48 PM by Kayla Woodrunner.)
Post: #13
RE: New Fur Tonkinese Champagne recessiveness
Love the job you're doing with breeding the tonki. Too bad with Suzette and Rolo, they both did not get the Champagne and both got the Champ's hid, the Blue Marble. Looking forward to seeing the hidden on Keith and Munchkin.

Even if the Reve's parents and grandparents show the same fur, you can still have a hidden different fur because hiddens can pass for generations -- I have pushed a hidden behind a dominant fur for 5 generations before popping it. Unless of course if you got the Chat cocoa out from behind a starter or a more dominant fur in the beginning of the line, then it can only be that. Most people don't start their lines that way. That's why I use proving hiddens on a baby as the final proof -- it can't be disputed. Showing the hidden on Kieth or Munchkin will be the perfect proof. I can see that you birthed Keith. Has he had a child and proven his hidden yet? I'm think it'll be the Chat but just was curious on the confirmation.

"In ancient times cats were worshipped as gods; they have not forgotten this." Terry Pratchett
Der Kitty Mill
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
 Thanks given by: Reven Rosca
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: New Fur Tonkinese Champagne recessiveness - Kayla Woodrunner - 02-28-2016 03:47 PM



User(s) browsing this thread: