|
RE: Some thoughts about The Grid-Wide AuctioN Calendar for KittyCats
Tad, I agree with removing the inactive activities from the calendar. I support that 100%. But not over a two week period when a person may be sick or on vacation. They are not robots.
Arwen and Icestrom, thank you. We do not want to confuse the community with a second calendar and of course, we would support a fair calendar, but making rules such as a two week no auction drop, is absolutely ridiculous. Real Life happens. What happened to understanding that? Also, Bree was online when I sent her the note, for a long while I waited for a response and none came in.
PS. I wonder who gives them rights to create rules without bringing them to the community if the calendar is a community effort? Shouldn't the community vote?
This is no personal attack to Bree or the work she has done. I have always respected it and she knows it. I am saying NO to a ridiculous and insensitive rule that treats people inhumanely. If the calendar is a NEWSPAPER, as it was called by Sierra in her note to me, then the information in the calendar NEEDS to be accurate: Auction X returns on X/X.2015 (vacation) or (illness). Newspapers send the information accurately. The auction does not vanish, it just has a hold for real life reasons and any respectable newspaper will bring the news as they are. So if the calendar is a newspaper as they called it, then please, keep the news accurate. A dropped auction means it DOES NOT EXIST.
|
Some thoughts about The Grid-Wide AuctioN Calendar for KittyCats
