|
RE: Hiding Confusion
No attack, simply stating that the attachment itself tends to prove the reverse of the claim.
Think of it this way .. since it's unlikely the maternal grandmother's fur appears in the offspring, would you believe the claim if her fur were something else, say Bengal Snow?
As I said, it's _possible_ the father hides Lynx. The pedigree attachment does not show that.
|
Hiding Confusion
