Please Be Carefull !!

[Dimpz Morane]

(05-21-2014 11:17 AM)Ivy Norsk Wrote:  As I see it there are two reasons for a second proof. The first is just in case of human misinterpretation of what one is seeing in the analysis particularly in the (unlikely) event that an Even-More-Recessive thing is lurking that just mucks up what one is seeing.

The other - and it is to the credit of the community that this hasn't happened - is for evidence to be falsely photoshopped of some new trait or other for the lolz: "OH HEY, I'VE DISCOVERED THE WHIRLY-TWIRLY TAIL. AND IT'S SUPER-RECESSIVE." Like that.

It would be a short-lived prank to be sure, but it could happen.

I agree, 2nd proof is needed. If my memory serves me correct, sometime last year there was an error regarding the top fur, can't exactly remember which fur it was, however it was declared the most recessive, only for us to find out a few weeks later, that it wasn't.