|
RE: trait passing question
The dominance charts are not that hard, are they?
The fur chart has some 'working notes' on it, yes. But it's really just a straight top-down list. The higher up the page, the more dominant.
If you don't see the fur in that left-hand column, we don't know exactly where it falls. For most of those furs, the columns on the right are our present knowledge, as a range .. "We know it should be somewhere between here .. and here." For those, I'd suggest you just look at the top of the range for them and you'll be 'safe'.
For the Genesis furs, the working notes up at the top use > to mean "Is dominant to". So, "Diamond III > Flame III" means we know Diamond III is dominant to Flame III, but we don't know if there are other Genesis III furs between them.
The OP, if submitted to Liriel Garnet as a capture of the Pedigree View page for the box and showing both parents, will mean a new working note would be added showing "Smokey III > Flame III". So the working notes would then read:
Diamond III > Smokey III > Flame III
Diamond III > Smokey III > Domino III
This means we know Diamond III is dominant to Smokey III; and we know Smokey III is dominant to both Flame III and Domino III; but we don't know whether Flame III is dominant or recessive to Domino III; and we have no idea at all about Coco III's relationship to the other Genesis III furs.
|
