Thank you Cloe thats great work on the Abyssininan - Salt & Pepper proof, however, unless you can show purity of the Bengal - Blue or show it pulled back out by a more recessive fur, I can't actually update as dominant to it. We do need absolute proof in order to update the charts.
The Aby S&P is a good absolute proof.
Regarding the second profiler pedigree, the likely hid there is actually the Bengal Blue that would have been under the Salt & Pepper, not the burmilla Choc in the Tan line as Tan was the showing fur so the hidden couldn't have passed, the Toyger Tan mother hides either Aby S&P or Bengal Blue or better, since you proved its recessive to the Aby S&P it has to be the Bengal Blue or better from that side of the line.
These pedigrees are a very good indication that it will be dominant to Bengal - Blue, unfortunately they just need a bit more to be absolute proofs. Discovering the hidden fur of either of the Purple Kiwis shown here would be a huge help.
Came back and had another look at your profiler pedigree, the part that matters is this bit
![[Image: 7ea0cd3bc720a94f1686eacc1e5e25bb.png]](https://gyazo.com/7ea0cd3bc720a94f1686eacc1e5e25bb.png)
If you can show a pedigree proving that either the Aby Salt & Pepper or its Dad hides Bengal - Blue that will be enough, because you have proved the Purple Kiwi can't hide Toyger - Tan or Aby S&P
