(11-01-2017 05:23 PM)Eleanor8 Resident Wrote: If you are going to invite public votes then you have to trust the public and the entrants – or else scrap the public vote all together.
Thank you Priestess and Eleanor for a great post. That was my whole point of view in regards to the public votes. It's probably just best to not even let the public be involved in the voting process.
However, I do understand Calle's perspective on a audit system to ensure there was not cheating involved, but as Priestess pointed out (and those who understood my argument), the math just doesn't add up. When you see the calculations that doesn't add up, it will make you question the process unless there is a formula that we just don't understand. From what I see the 2 highest votes must have beend disqualified, and if that's the case, then state that oppose to leaving them in the dark.
Anyways, congratz to the winners regardless.
