(01-10-2013 09:10 AM)zivaah Resident Wrote: you are taking what i am saying way out of context because i did not say anything about kittycats not being able to manage privacy issues and you self say at the end that kittycats would never implement a feature that could lead to misuse. isn't this why the pedigree is not available for public viewing?
even when i do not see a reason to be repeating what i said from start i will just give you an idea copyboting of products. because you don't see this possibility doesn't mean it cant be done. and again i am not saying it will be done.
so yeah i will agree to disagree because this started somewhere and kind of going somewhere else.
I believe I haven't deviated from the reason of this post, you posted a reason for not being completely sure this idea was good by making a statement you believe can be an issue, and I confessed myself ignorant of it and I asked you to explain a bit more about it. This is the solely reason why I asked.
I did not mean to point at anything or pick on anything you said. My remark about KittyCats didn't intend to say you suggested the opposite, all I tried to say is that I trust they extinguish all the possibilities during the testing process of the features before they they offer them to us.
I don't know anything about copyboting so I cannot offer my views on this and from my ignorant point of view I cannot see how the KittyCats ID, which is public and shared every time you click on a cat can make this illegal practice easier, hence why I asked you to explain it to me.
This is a forum and we discuss ideas and share our experiences, I'm sorry if at any moment you felt I mislead the course of the topic, but i strongly believe I didn't.
Have a nice day
G?????
?