KittyCatS! Community Forum

You found, Sassy whiskers in its started?

Use this topic to post your evidence in relation to the new trait Sassy whiskers.

We all appreciate your help!

Thank you for these iniatives

I have evidence for 'Sassy whiskers' is between: Boo Boo and Wavy


Pedigree 1: Sassy, Dominant to, Wavy whiskers
> http://gyazo.com/0eaac5bfa2e10c063e475bbcd4ef0025




Pedigree 2: Sassy, Recessive to, Boo Boo whiskers
> http://gyazo.com/ae1a2e44543c826e35d5dbaa0c681749






I will provide a proof for wavy behind Sassy. Then everything will be ok.

I already sent this in to sagakitty, this is what I believed was solid evidence that shows Wavy is recessive to Sassy whiskers, but the reply i got back is it is not proof of where Sassy whiskers lie as they already know they lie between Boo Boo and Fussy, and i needed to find proof of where it lies between those two traits. I'm not sure what I got wrong here, but I think this clearly shows Sassy whiskers being dominant to Wavy whiskers, and wavy whisker is the trait between Fussy and Boo Boo right? These are the same pedigrees I sent in. Please tell me what you think, am I wrong to think that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers?

I think this shows that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/83627fcceba29e360bfcc7af10b4a2b6


It appears to me that again Smartie hides wavy whiskers behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/553f8944561f6febb4cf7cae76c32628

AstridSolace, I have to agree with you that your pictures look pretty solid. Your pictures look pretty clear to me that Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.

Picture A, Mom Chocolate Peach has frazzled showing and hides Sassy or something more recessive
Dad Cream Soda has mysterious showing and hides Swanky or something more recessive.
child shows wavy. Wavy is known to be dominant to Swanky so could not come from Dad. Wavy has to be mom's hidden which means Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy. Grandmom Smartie has to have Sassy shown, Wavy hidden.

Picture B, Mom Smartie shows Sassy, Dad Vanilla Ice shows Dreamy. Child shows Wavy. Dreamy is known to be recessive to Wavy so Wavy cannot come from the father. That means Smartie has Sassy shown, Wavy hidden. So again Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.

Good job.

Sagakitty has a 2 proof rule, I think. i don't know if they have to have the 2 proofs by 2 different people. I would send Picture B again to them as it is clearer than picture A.
But if Sassy is already known to be recessive to Boo Boo, then this completely places it as between Boo Boo and Wavy.

(09-22-2014 09:54 AM)Kayla Woodrunner Wrote: [ -> ]AstridSolace, I have to agree with you that your pictures look pretty solid. Your pictures look pretty clear to me that Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.

Picture A, Mom Chocolate Peach has frazzled showing and hides Sassy or something more recessive
Dad Cream Soda has mysterious showing and hides Swanky or something more recessive.
child shows wavy. Wavy is known to be dominant to Swanky so could not come from Dad. Wavy has to be mom's hidden which means Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy. Grandmom Smartie has to have Sassy shown, Wavy hidden.

Picture B, Mom Smartie shows Sassy, Dad Vanilla Ice shows Dreamy. Child shows Wavy. Dreamy is known to be recessive to Wavy so Wavy cannot come from the father. That means Smartie has Sassy shown, Wavy hidden. So again Wavy has to be recessive to Sassy.

Good job.

Sagakitty has a 2 proof rule, I think. i don't know if they have to have the 2 proofs by 2 different people. I would send Picture B again to them as it is clearer than picture A.
But if Sassy is already known to be recessive to Boo Boo, then this completely places it as between Boo Boo and Wavy.

Thank you and yes, that's what my thoughts were also. I sent them a notecard saying that i had proofs that sassy was recessive to wavy whiskers, and well the reply was only that this only proves its somewhere between Fussy and Boo Boo which they already knew, and they are looking for information that shows where it places between fussy and boo boo, and if i could find that they would be grateful, so I then resent a week ago and asked they look again, but never heard back. I can only guess it was rejected.

(09-22-2014 06:35 AM)AstridSolace Resident Wrote: [ -> ]It appears to me that again Smartie hides wavy whiskers behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/553f8944561f6febb4cf7cae76c32628

Hello Astrid.

Many thanks for sharing your test with us. I started this movement, so that all tests are published, and not hidden in the hand of a single person.

That's why I created my own Graphics Mr.Cat: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?..._web#gid=0

If you notice, my chart shows all images, and the evidence, the test for each new trait.


Your second image is perfect. Its proves Wavy, hidden in Sassy Whiskers.


Thanks again.

(09-22-2014 06:35 AM)AstridSolace Resident Wrote: [ -> ]These are the same pedigrees I sent in. Please tell me what you think, am I wrong to think that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers?

I think this shows that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/83627fcceba29e360bfcc7af10b4a2b6


It appears to me that again Smartie hides wavy whiskers behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/553f8944561f6febb4cf7cae76c32628

Hi Astrid, these don't match the ones you sent me? They were different pictures and the top corner was covered up by some window or floating box or something? And that was all I got, I never got a reply from you (not that you didn't send it, SL is a hungry beast, but if you don't get a reply from the SagaKitty account or directly from one of us that manage it, the message/inventory was never received - one of us always replies)... anyway I'll send you an IM in-world.

We are very careful about keeping the information accurate so forgive us if we seem overly cautious about having all of the pedigrees or ask for grandparents, etc. We don't want to be like some of the inaccurate sites that have cropped up lately where things are placed based on assumptions and guesses. We are detailed to the point of annoyance but we want to make sure everything is exactly right

(09-22-2014 06:51 PM)Wendi Lavendel Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-22-2014 06:35 AM)AstridSolace Resident Wrote: [ -> ]These are the same pedigrees I sent in. Please tell me what you think, am I wrong to think that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers?

I think this shows that Wavy hides behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/83627fcceba29e360bfcc7af10b4a2b6


It appears to me that again Smartie hides wavy whiskers behind the Sassy whiskers. http://gyazo.com/553f8944561f6febb4cf7cae76c32628

Hi Astrid, these don't match the ones you sent me? They were different pictures and the top corner was covered up by some window or floating box or something? And that was all I got, I never got a reply from you (not that you didn't send it, SL is a hungry beast, but if you don't get a reply from the SagaKitty account or directly from one of us that manage it, the message/inventory was never received - one of us always replies)... anyway I'll send you an IM in-world.

We are very careful about keeping the information accurate so forgive us if we seem overly cautious about having all of the pedigrees or ask for grandparents, etc. We don't want to be like some of the inaccurate sites that have cropped up lately where things are placed based on assumptions and guesses. We are detailed to the point of annoyance but we want to make sure everything is exactly right

Congratulations for the work Wendi. You have worked really hard.

You are welcome to post all exhaustive evidence you have on sassy whiskers, here in this post. Or, display them in graphic Saga.

This is what happens when everything is secret, and nothing visible.

We avoid two jobs. Two graphs.