05-31-2014, 03:32 AM
This is for the benefit of those who have difficulty in assimilating the ins and outs of breeding.
I know that many get very frustrated when they don't understand this system and can even start doubting their intelligence even if they have good or even higher capacities in general.
We each have two basic forms of intelligence, the analytical and the synthetic. Now i'm not sure if synthetic is the correct word in english but briefly it means the brain's capacity to transfer and use informations to create something else that they have never been taught.
One of the BIG problems with our western education is that it privileges the analytic over the synthetic, which is one of the reasons that the minority who have naturally well developed synthetic qualities often have a very hard time of it in schooling.
This is why IQ tests are a very poor standard indicator as the majority of the questions engage only the analytic.
This is also a perverse and deliberate way to dumb down the populations and discourage creativity and individuality, stop us from reacting and creating solutions to combat the ever growing list of abnormalities imposed upon us by a world mafia system.
The analytic is also the capacity to learn by heart, without really understanding the underlying process and implications of what one is learning, and simply to apply it a given problem, mathematical or other.
Those with a preponderance of analytic to the detriment of synthetic will not be very creative in any domain of thought or the arts.
Needless to say, those in this norm will often have less trouble assimilating the KC breeding system than those who aren't.
Of course all this is general and we each have our own unique mental and character composition but it can explain quite a few cases of " DUH ? "
An example i can give is my dad recently.
Now he is a forever researcher in Quantum Mechanics and i recently showed him what i was doing in KCs and tried explaining to him how it worked, showing him infos on this site and also explaining by telephone.
He actually has both capacities extremely developed but after a few hours of this i was hopping with exasperation because he just could not integrate what is an extremely simple and basic concept, and i don't think i'm the worst at explaining it either. i finally threw him the Punnet Square and he was able to work it out from there … i think.
Of course this doesn't mean that those who have trouble with the method are all geniuses but it does mean that you are probably no dumber than those who have picked it up fast.
I could go on and on but this just about covers what i have to say.
anna xx
I know that many get very frustrated when they don't understand this system and can even start doubting their intelligence even if they have good or even higher capacities in general.
We each have two basic forms of intelligence, the analytical and the synthetic. Now i'm not sure if synthetic is the correct word in english but briefly it means the brain's capacity to transfer and use informations to create something else that they have never been taught.
One of the BIG problems with our western education is that it privileges the analytic over the synthetic, which is one of the reasons that the minority who have naturally well developed synthetic qualities often have a very hard time of it in schooling.
This is why IQ tests are a very poor standard indicator as the majority of the questions engage only the analytic.
This is also a perverse and deliberate way to dumb down the populations and discourage creativity and individuality, stop us from reacting and creating solutions to combat the ever growing list of abnormalities imposed upon us by a world mafia system.
The analytic is also the capacity to learn by heart, without really understanding the underlying process and implications of what one is learning, and simply to apply it a given problem, mathematical or other.
Those with a preponderance of analytic to the detriment of synthetic will not be very creative in any domain of thought or the arts.
Needless to say, those in this norm will often have less trouble assimilating the KC breeding system than those who aren't.
Of course all this is general and we each have our own unique mental and character composition but it can explain quite a few cases of " DUH ? "
An example i can give is my dad recently.
Now he is a forever researcher in Quantum Mechanics and i recently showed him what i was doing in KCs and tried explaining to him how it worked, showing him infos on this site and also explaining by telephone.
He actually has both capacities extremely developed but after a few hours of this i was hopping with exasperation because he just could not integrate what is an extremely simple and basic concept, and i don't think i'm the worst at explaining it either. i finally threw him the Punnet Square and he was able to work it out from there … i think.
Of course this doesn't mean that those who have trouble with the method are all geniuses but it does mean that you are probably no dumber than those who have picked it up fast.
I could go on and on but this just about covers what i have to say.
anna xx
