KittyCatS! Community Forum

I might have to confirm that I understand how I must count the traits:
FUR
COLOUR FUR
EYES
SHAPE EYES
PUPIL EYES
SHADE
TAIL
EARS
WHISKERS
SHAPE WHISKERS

(12-06-2013 04:14 AM)Ophelia Kira Wrote: [ -> ]I might have to confirm that I understand how I must count the traits:
FUR
COLOUR FUR
EYES
SHAPE EYES
PUPIL EYES
SHADE
TAIL
EARS
WHISKERS
SHAPE WHISKERS

Not quite.
Fur
Eyes
Eye shape
Pupil size
Shade
Tail
Ears
Whisker color
Whisker shape

[/quote]

Not quite.
Fur
Eyes
Eye shape
Pupil size
Shade
Tail
Ears
Whisker color
Whisker shape






[/quote]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!!!!
NOW is ALL MORE UNDERSTOOD!!!!!

For eyes anything Curious/Big does not count since it's a starter trait. Or anything that's a genesis trait and for whiskers guitar and silver do not count as well. It's anything that is not a starter trait that's considered a unique passable trait.

For eyes anything Curious/Big does not count since it's a starter trait. Or anything that's a genesis trait and for whiskers guitar and silver do not count as well. It's anything that is not a starter trait that's considered a unique passable trait.

That was one of my first questions when I started with KittyCats - was there a bengal and an abyssinian and a russian etc., that were sorrel and copper and charcoal or in the case of russians: black, white and blue. Finding out that each Type/color of cat was a "fur" and quite independent of all other "furs" even if the breed of cat was the same as some others was an important piece of information.

(12-06-2013 07:51 AM)Ivy Norsk Wrote: [ -> ]That was one of my first questions when I started with KittyCats - was there a bengal and an abyssinian and a russian etc., that were sorrel and copper and charcoal or in the case of russians: black, white and blue. Finding out that each Type/color of cat was a "fur" and quite independent of all other "furs" even if the breed of cat was the same as some others was an important piece of information.

In fact, I was wrong to not inform me immediately, now I have to make a selection in the breeding and change the prices of new born, damn my ignorance

(12-06-2013 11:42 AM)Tad Carlucci Wrote: [ -> ]* Tad Carlucci bemoans the loss of the good ol' days of LISTSERV when he could run a simple auto-responder suggesting people read the FAQ before posting questions.

Replies to posts are more detailed that the FAQ, involve a dialogue with people who have experience, and I understood a lot more than after reading the faq. you're not obligated to read and respond to posts.